IIPLA News
Thursday, May 14, 2026

European Commission Updates Technology Licensing Framework with New Guidance on Data and Joint Negotiations

Revised EU rules on technology transfer agreements introduce antitrust clarifications for data licensing and licensing negotiation groups, effective May 2026

IIPLA News Deskanonymous access0 articles left this week
European Commission Updates Technology Licensing Framework with New Guidance on Data and Joint Negotiations

The European Union has adopted a revised set of rules governing technology licensing agreements, with the updated Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation (TTBER) and Guidelines set to take effect on 1 May 2026. This revision marks a significant modernization of the EU’s competition law framework for technology transfers, addressing recent market developments such as data licensing and joint negotiation arrangements among technology implementers.

The TTBER, originally enacted in 2014, exempts certain technology transfer agreements from the prohibition on anticompetitive agreements under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The accompanying Guidelines provide detailed interpretations of the TTBER’s application to various intellectual property licensing scenarios, including technology pools and standard essential patent (SEP) licensing.

A notable innovation in the revised Guidelines is the European Commission’s first formal guidance on licensing negotiation groups (LNGs). LNGs are agreements where technology implementers negotiate collectively the terms of technology licenses. The Guidelines discuss both the potential pro-competitive effects of LNGs—such as reducing transaction costs, facilitating informed negotiations, and mitigating first-mover disadvantages—and the risks, including excessive bargaining power, information exchange that could facilitate collusion, and foreclosure of competitors in downstream markets.

Despite a public consultation and a draft proposal that included a soft safe harbour for LNGs, the Commission ultimately decided against adopting such a safe harbour. The rationale was limited enforcement experience with LNGs and concerns that a safe harbour might either fail to address competition risks or deter beneficial LNGs through overly prescriptive conditions.

Instead, the revised Guidelines set out measures to mitigate antitrust risks associated with LNGs. These include ensuring open and voluntary participation for both technology holders and licensee groups, limiting information exchanges to what is strictly necessary and proportionate, and prohibiting restrictions on technology holders’ ability to negotiate with third parties.

The revised framework reflects recent enforcement experience within the EU. For example, in 2024, the German Bundeskartellamt reviewed the German Automotive Licensing Negotiation Group, a joint negotiation initiative involving BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Thyssenkrupp, and Volkswagen for SEP mobile communication standards technology. The authority found the LNG lawful under conditions such as limiting negotiations to general mobile communication standards (4G/LTE, 5G, 6G), openness to new participants including automotive parts suppliers, voluntary participation, and safeguards against excessive information exchange. The European Commission issued informal guidance in July 2025 affirming the LNG’s lawfulness under similar conditions.

The revised Guidelines also clarify the treatment of technology pools, which are arrangements where companies combine complementary technologies into a single licensing package. While technology pools can reduce transaction costs and facilitate implementation of pro-competitive standards, they may also restrict competition by pooling substitute technologies or foreclosing alternatives.

The updated safe harbour conditions for technology pools require full disclosure to licensees of all individual rights included and the methodology for assessing essentiality. Pools must avoid “double dipping,” where licensees pay multiple times for the same rights, and licenses granted by the pool must be on fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) terms.

Data licensing agreements, increasingly prevalent in the digital economy, are addressed explicitly for the first time. The revised Guidelines confirm that data licensing agreements may be exempt under the TTBER only if the licensed data qualifies as a technology right under the regulation, such as patents, know-how, utility models, design rights, or software copyrights.

For other types of data and data rights, the Commission will apply TTBER principles to data resembling protected technology rights, like copyright-protected databases. Otherwise, licensing agreements involving data will be assessed on a case-by-case basis. The Guidelines emphasize that information exchanges in database licensing generally do not restrict competition by object, but exchanges must be objectively necessary and proportionate. If not, or if the exchange of commercially sensitive information is the main object, the Horizontal Guidelines will apply.

Parties engaged in technology licensing agreements within the EU should carefully review the revised TTBER and Guidelines to ensure compliance with the updated safe harbour conditions and to understand the new regulatory stance on LNGs and data licensing. The changes reflect the European Commission’s effort to balance innovation incentives with competition safeguards in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.

Share This Article
Ready-to-post copy includes the article link.

European Commission Updates Technology Licensing Framework with New Guidance on Data and Joint Negotiations The European Union has finalized revisions to its Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation (TTBER) and accompanying Guidelines, modernizing the regulatory framework for technology licensing agreements. Key updates... Read the full IIPLA article: https://iipla.org/news/european-commission-updates-technology-licensing-framework-with-new-guidance-on-data-and-joint-negotiations

Related Coverage

Continue in the newsroom

Back to newsroom
PatentsGlobal

UPM Expands Renewable Chemicals Portfolio with Acquisition of Avantium’s Bio-Glycol IP

UPM has acquired Avantium’s intellectual property for Ray Technology, enabling production of bio-based mono-ethylene glycol and mono-propylene glycol from plant sugars. The deal strengthens UPM’s renewable chemicals capabilities and supports its Leuna biorefinery operations. Avantium refocuses on FDCA and PEF technolo…

Friday, May 15, 2026
PatentsGlobal

Dar AlMuhama Law Firm Elevates Kuwaiti IP Expertise at INTA 2026 in London

Dar AlMuhama Law Firm, led by Founder and Managing Partner Abdulrahman Alhouti, participated in the 2026 International Trademark Association Annual Meeting in London. The firm contributed to high-level discussions on advancing IP frameworks in the Middle East and addressed emerging issues such as artificial intelligen…

Friday, May 15, 2026
PatentsGlobal

UNH Law Students Champion Gender Equity in Intellectual Property Practice

At the University of New Hampshire’s Franklin Pierce School of Law, students are actively addressing the persistent gender disparity in intellectual property law. Through the Intellectual Property Law Association’s annual Women in Intellectual Property Night and partnerships with leading IP professionals, the school f…

Friday, May 15, 2026
EnforcementUSA

U.S. Customs Recordation Empowers Trademark and Copyright Holders to Combat Counterfeits

Trademark and copyright owners registered in the United States can leverage recordation with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to prevent the importation of counterfeit and infringing goods. This enforcement tool, which includes a streamlined application process and modest fees, enables CBP officers to detain s…

Friday, May 15, 2026